(update: the site this link goes to from 2010 is going away, so I'm reproducing it here)
I posted a brief article on my workplace blog that I figured I'd link to here:
Can Students Tell the Difference?
It discusses the problems students face in identifying the types and usefulness of information they find in online library databases.
|Screenshot from Academic Search Complete|
The problem isn’t necessarily one of students’ lack of attention to the details in front of them (journal title, year, etc.) or not knowing what a scholarly resource is supposed to look like. Those can certainly be contributing factors, but a larger problem is caused by the unifying and democratizing nature of the online medium itself. In most of the larger research databases these days, peer-reviewed journal articles sit alongside trade and popular magazine articles, as well as newspaper articles, conference reports, dissertations and theses, encyclopedia entries, and even e-books. On the surface, as the image above shows, there is little that distinguishes these different kinds of information sources to the untrained eye.
As experienced scholars and expert researchers we know all the little things that might (or might not) help us determine the source of a piece of information, even through the homogenizing ‘skin’ of an online database. We know how to read critically. We know the basic elements of presenting research results and where to look for author affiliations. The problem is that students are neither comfortable yet with the issues, knowledge or even language of their field of study, nor experienced in using scholarly materials and search tools in general.
When you don’t know what questions to ask, you tend not to ask any questions at all.
As a result, students often take (and then quote in their papers) whatever results show up in a search, regardless of who wrote them, when or why they were published, or even if they don’t directly support their argument. Again, this is not the fault, in most cases, of the students themselves. The sad truth is that most students entering higher education (everywhere and of all ages, not just our own learners) have not yet encountered the need or been motivated to acquire the skills needed to critically read, evaluate, synthesize, and most importantly create new information. This is becoming especially true when a majority of that information is in a wide variety of electronic and multimedia formats.
I don’t have any easy solutions to this issue. The library has taken some initial steps in this battle with our Information Skills Tutorial and our @Home Library Workshops. But these limited and voluntary learning opportunities can only go so far. Successfully and sustainably tackling the urgent need for better information, research, and critical thinking skills in our new and graduating students will probably need a college- and even SUNY-wide collaborative effort; an effort that will require input and effort from faculty, administrators, instructional designers, student support staff, librarians and more.
My hope is that a growing discussion on these issues here at Empire State College is a good place to start. There are certainly short-term, as well as long-term things we can do to begin.