Isn't all this 2.0 stuff wonderful? Tools that promote the creation, reorganization, re-imagining, meshing and sharing of all kinds of information in all kinds of different and exciting ways can't be a bad thing, can it? I'm certainly an avid cheerleader for all this, but I do think there are some possible downsides to consider from a library institutional perspective before we invest ourselves too deeply in all this.
But I must state up front that I do have some bias. Diving full-force into this 2.0 world of endlessly creative possibilities has resparked my love for my chosen profession, as I imagine it has for at least some other librarians out there. To me, this opening of service creativity has allowed us to finally and definitively break free of the confines of the physical book and the stodgy and user-incomprehensible organizational schemes dating back to the 19th century. It has hopefully also contributed to the beginning of the end for the popular view of the library as simply "the place where they store the books," and has helped us vastly expand the possibilities and just-in-time usefulness of the previously limiting and overly formal librarian-user and user-information interactions.
But I do worry a bit about the long-term outcomes of all this rapid adoption of mostly unestablished 2.0 applications. What percentage of our best-intentioned efforts to design more effective user-info applications will be destroyed or made quickly obsolete by the inevitable death or commercialization of many of these 2.0 tools, incompatible or non-existent technology and organizational standards, the arrival of 3.0 (some aspects of which I am skeptical of ever arriving, however), and the inevitable wearing off of the "wow" factor? And how about long-term maintenance, scalability and portability issues? Are they being considered and planned for in your development cycle? I certainly try to plan for them, but the reality is that it isn't always possible - pressures of time and money and rapid change make this hard.
In the end, our efforts will go on and are essential to improving services. As Meredith Farkas wrote recently, it's also essential for us to share our failures as much as our successes. More than likely all these issues will work themselves out with some 2.0 technologies falling to the wayside and others moving on and evolving into the coming 3.0 world. Those will take their place in the always expanding suite of available online information applications, alongside web sites, OPACs, virtual reference, etc. I think it is a useful exercise to consider these longer-term issues now and ideally plan for them as much as possible in the development cycle.
Monday, December 24, 2007
Thursday, December 13, 2007
map mash-up of medical libraries in NYS
[update on this: this application already exists here! Not sure yet if I'm more relieved I don't have to spend time to build it or depressed because I don't get a chance to play with the technology...]
I want to create an interactive map mash-up that uses a map of NY State and shows the location of medical/health and SUNY/CUNY libraries. Each location would include links to the library web site as well as their catalog and perhaps display their hours of operation when applicable (and of course, a way to get directions to each).
This would be an application for our upcoming nursing bachelor's program, to which I am liaison. The students will primarily be adult distance learners (those working in the field with an RN already) and spread throughout the state and beyond. We have an extensive online library, but our students do have the occasional need to consult a print book or journal, so having such an application would be valuable.
However, at first glance it appears that one must have some knowledge of JavaScript (or PHP) in order to manipulate the Google or Yahoo API directly and create such an application that way. Alas I don't have such knowledge at present (although learning Javascript basics is at the top of my prof dev list!).
On the other hand, I have found a couple possible programs that do most of the programming work for you that I think could work:
I actually just now found an application for metro NYC libraries that is almost exactly what I would want on a state-wide scale and uses Community Walk.
Has anyone used some of these applications and have a preference? Are there hidden disadvantages to some of these? I'm being purely lazy here and hoping to cut the corner of having to evaluate and compare them myself...
I want to create an interactive map mash-up that uses a map of NY State and shows the location of medical/health and SUNY/CUNY libraries. Each location would include links to the library web site as well as their catalog and perhaps display their hours of operation when applicable (and of course, a way to get directions to each).
This would be an application for our upcoming nursing bachelor's program, to which I am liaison. The students will primarily be adult distance learners (those working in the field with an RN already) and spread throughout the state and beyond. We have an extensive online library, but our students do have the occasional need to consult a print book or journal, so having such an application would be valuable.
However, at first glance it appears that one must have some knowledge of JavaScript (or PHP) in order to manipulate the Google or Yahoo API directly and create such an application that way. Alas I don't have such knowledge at present (although learning Javascript basics is at the top of my prof dev list!).
On the other hand, I have found a couple possible programs that do most of the programming work for you that I think could work:
I actually just now found an application for metro NYC libraries that is almost exactly what I would want on a state-wide scale and uses Community Walk.
Has anyone used some of these applications and have a preference? Are there hidden disadvantages to some of these? I'm being purely lazy here and hoping to cut the corner of having to evaluate and compare them myself...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)